Surveys
Study Adds To Debate Over Whether US Should Implement A Single Fiduciary Standard For FAs
Industry disagreements regarding an extension of the
traditional fiduciary standard to include broker-dealers should
not stop regulators
from “acting decisively” on behalf of investors, writes Kathleen
McBride, editor
of a new survey.
At present, RIAs must adhere to a fiduciary standard
under the Investment Advisers Act (1940), while brokers operate
under a
“suitability” rule and are regulated by FINRA rather than the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
Dodd-Frank allowed the SEC to
establish a uniform standard for advisors and broker-dealers
providing personalized investment advice to retail customers.
However, disagreements have delayed the process and the authority
has yet to announce when, or if, it will proceed.
Supporters of a more robust standard hope the SEC
will act without further delay. Indeed, last
August a group of well-known
leaders in the investment world urged Congress, the SEC and the
Department of
Labor to “extend and heighten” protection for investors receiving
advice.
However, some financial services companies are fighting to
prevent proposal of
the rules, which would require brokers to put investors’
interests first.
According to 79 per cent of the 2013 fi360-ThinkAdvisor
Fiduciary Survey,
extending the fiduciary standard to include broker-dealers
wouldn’t cost
investors more for advice, while 69 per cent believe it wouldn’t
price investors out of
the market and 68 per cent say it wouldn't affect access to
advice or products.
However, many respondents claimed investors don’t
have the information required to choose of the type of advisor or
sales
relationship they would like, and thus argue that clarification
regarding the
roles of intermediaries - through titles, firm purpose and
disclosure - is
needed.
Meanwhile, an overwhelming 97 per cent believe that
investors don’t understand the differences between brokers and
investment advisors,
as 72 per cent said the titles “advisor,” “consultant,” and
“planner” imply a
fiduciary relationship exists. Disclosures alone are not
sufficient to manage
conflicts of interest, according to 82 per cent.
McBride previously said that this issue is critical not just for wealthy investors but for “investors of all stripes,” and especially for people saving for retirement. In fact, 79 per cent of respondents to fi360 and ThinkAdvisor's latest survey agreed that ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) fiduciary duty should cover advice on rollovers out of 401(k)s and IRAs.