Print this article
Pressure On Global Firms At Risk Of Corruption Gets Results - Investor Group
Tom Burroughes
26 April 2013
Global companies that are potentially at risk of bribery and
corruption scandals have taken major steps to be more open about how they
intend to deal with these issues, following a three-year campaign by an
international investment group. Some three quarters of companies targeted by 21 signatories
to the Principles for Responsible Investment, a global body of investors, found
that firms improved their disclosure and understanding of anti-corruption risk
management, a statement on behalf of the investors, including firms such as
Hermes and F&C Asset Management, said yesterday. The investor group collectively manages more than $1.7
trillion in assets; it began to engage with 21 companies across 14 countries in
March 2010 to encourage them to demonstrate that they had appropriate anti-corruption
controls. The wealth management industry, like other sectors, has come
under growing pressure to tighten controls against corruption. In the UK, for
example, the recently enacted Bribery Act imposes tougher – although not always
clearly understood – rules on corporate and individual behaviour. The statement from the investment group said it encouraged
firms to report on their anti-corruption risk management that fit with
international standards, such as the International Corporate Governance
Network’s Statement and Guidance on Anti-Corruption Practices and the UN Global
Compact’s Reporting Guidance on the 10th Principle Against Corruption. Each of the 21 companies were selected because of their “poor
public disclosure of anti-corruption risk management and high levels of
corruption risk because of the nature of their businesses”, the statement said. Methodology developed by Transparency International, called
Transparency in Reporting on Anti-Corruption, was used to assess companies
against 50 indicators relating to their anti-corruption strategy, policy and
management systems. By early 2013, some 16 companies have improved their
performance against the indicators, with ten companies improving their score by
four-fold, and the leading company improving its score by six-fold, the
statement said. “We have seen in recent high-profile cases, even if
corruption is not prosecuted, the huge reputational and financial damage it can
cause to the companies engaging in it. More than that, it siphons value to the
corrupt, inhibits fair competition and impedes economic development to the
detriment not only of shareholders’ portfolios but of companies’ other
stakeholders and wider society,” Tim Goodman, associate director at Hermes
Ownership Services, said. “Anti-corruption has been a key priority area for us for
many years since it undermines the legitimacy and sustainability of economic
systems and provides huge risks to the companies we invest in,” said Christina
Hillesöy, chairperson of the Ethical Council, a collaboration between the First,
Second, Third and Fourth Swedish National Pension Fund.