Print this article

Pressure On Global Firms At Risk Of Corruption Gets Results - Investor Group

Tom Burroughes

26 April 2013

Global companies that are potentially at risk of bribery and corruption scandals have taken major steps to be more open about how they intend to deal with these issues, following a three-year campaign by an international investment group.

Some three quarters of companies targeted by 21 signatories to the Principles for Responsible Investment, a global body of investors, found that firms improved their disclosure and understanding of anti-corruption risk management, a statement on behalf of the investors, including firms such as Hermes and F&C Asset Management, said yesterday.

The investor group collectively manages more than $1.7 trillion in assets; it began to engage with 21 companies across 14 countries in March 2010 to encourage them to demonstrate that they had appropriate anti-corruption controls.

The wealth management industry, like other sectors, has come under growing pressure to tighten controls against corruption. In the UK, for example, the recently enacted Bribery Act imposes tougher – although not always clearly understood – rules on corporate and individual behaviour.

The statement from the investment group said it encouraged firms to report on their anti-corruption risk management that fit with international standards, such as the International Corporate Governance Network’s Statement and Guidance on Anti-Corruption Practices and the UN Global Compact’s Reporting Guidance on the 10th Principle Against Corruption.

Each of the 21 companies were selected because of their “poor public disclosure of anti-corruption risk management and high levels of corruption risk because of the nature of their businesses”, the statement said.

Methodology developed by Transparency International, called Transparency in Reporting on Anti-Corruption, was used to assess companies against 50 indicators relating to their anti-corruption strategy, policy and management systems.

By early 2013, some 16 companies have improved their performance against the indicators, with ten companies improving their score by four-fold, and the leading company improving its score by six-fold, the statement said.

“We have seen in recent high-profile cases, even if corruption is not prosecuted, the huge reputational and financial damage it can cause to the companies engaging in it. More than that, it siphons value to the corrupt, inhibits fair competition and impedes economic development to the detriment not only of shareholders’ portfolios but of companies’ other stakeholders and wider society,” Tim Goodman, associate director at Hermes Ownership Services, said.

“Anti-corruption has been a key priority area for us for many years since it undermines the legitimacy and sustainability of economic systems and provides huge risks to the companies we invest in,” said Christina Hillesöy, chairperson of the Ethical Council, a collaboration between the First, Second, Third and Fourth Swedish National Pension Fund.