Family Office
Overlay manager Placemark hits $3-billion AUM mark

Milestone coincides with new venture-capital infusion for pioneer
manager. Placemark Investments says its assets under management
had surpassed $3 billion by the end of August 2006 -- a milestone
achieved just four months after the Dallas- and Wellesley,
Mass.-based overlay manager surpassed the
$2-billion-in-managed-assets mark. Altogether, Placemark's assets
under management have more than tripled in the 12 months through
31 August 2006.
"We are well-positioned to take advantage of the explosive growth
in the unified managed account marketplace and are pleased that
our investors see great opportunity in backing Placemark's
expansion plans," says Placemark CEO Lee Chertavian.
Flood
This flood of assets is linked to the launch of unified managed
account (UMA) platforms by investment-platform sponsors that use
Placemark as an overlay manager. UMAs combine investment classes,
styles and vehicles in a single-registration account. In this
context, overlay management is the process of reconciling
redundant holdings across sub-accounts, aligning trading
activity, managing cash flow and enhancing the overall tax
efficiency of portfolios.
Placemark is overlay manager to PricewaterhouseCoopers' New
York-based UMA platform, Cleveland, Ohio-based McDonald
Investments (slated to become part of ubs.com UBS), Atlanta-based
Homrich & Berg, Philadelphia-based Janney Montgomery Scott, Piper
Jaffray's retail brokerage (recently acquired by UBS) and RBC
Dain Rauscher, both of Minneapolis, Canada's BMO Nesbitt Burns
and -- undoubtedly the principal source Placemark's recent growth
in assets under management -- Smith Barney. Placemark also
operates an all-UMA turnkey asset-management program for smaller
banks, broker dealers, and registered investment advisors.
UMAs, and the closely related multiple-discipline account (MDA),
are getting traction in the private-client space because they
provide fairly broad asset allocation and tax oversight with
lower investment-minimum hurdles than similarly diversified
portfolios of stand-alone separately managed accounts (SMAs).
They also feature comprehensive reporting that help investors
make better sense of their holdings and, at least in theory, make
the advisor's job easier by streamlining the consulting
process.
In an SMA market worth $646 billion at the end of September 2005,
UMAs and MDAs -- let's call them "overlay accounts" for short --
accounted for 14% or $83 billion of all SMA assets, according to
Westwood, Mass.-based research firm Dover Financial Research.
Active
Dover doesn't have annualized growth statistics for overlay
accounts, but it pegs year-over-year MDA growth at 35%, 31% and
39% for the years 2003, 2004 and 2005 respectively. By 2010,
Dover figures that overlay-account assets could reach $500
billion; if so, then MDAs alone could account for about half of
all SMA assets, according to several industry projections.
For now though, not all of this growth going to active
overlay managers like Placemark, Parametric, a Seattle-based
affiliate of asset manager Eaton Vance, and IXIS Asset Management
Advisors' Oakland, Calif.-based Managed Portfolio Advisors.
Dover estimates that active overlay -- which involves ongoing
modifications to investment-management models -- touches about
36% of all UMA assets under management. Meanwhile the greater
part of overlay assets are governed either by the sponsor's
"passive" overlay, which focuses on wash-sale considerations and
obvious tax issues, or a slightly more customized "hybrid"
approach, frequently undertaken by a participating asset manager,
not necessarily an overlay specialist, at the sponsor's
behest.
In addition to these approaches, Placemark and other active third
parties are up against overlay software providers such as
Smartleaf, Tamarac and InvestEdge.
Somebody out there must view Placemark's recent successes in the
overlay-account marketplace as a sign of health, however. The
firm just pulled in another $10 million in venture capital to
expand its operations. The funding was led by IDG Ventures
Boston, a new investor, with participation also from existing
investors Ascent Venture Partners, North Hill Ventures, and RBC
Technology Ventures. -FWR
. NAME