Investment Strategies
Middle East Conflict Causes Central Banks To Hold Rates

After central banks kept interest rates unchanged this week, wealth managers discuss the impact on asset allocation and the timing of potential rate cuts.
Central banks – the Bank of England (BoE), the European Central Bank (ECB), Bank of Japan (BoJ) and the US Federal Reserve – all kept interest rates unchanged this week, as expected, highlighting the severity of the Middle East conflict which has caused oil prices to surge.
The decisions signal that uncertainty and inflation risks have risen, mainly as a result of the oil-driven energy shock.
Although domestic conditions have improved in the UK, external factors played a key role in the BoE’s decision, and the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) unanimously voted to keep the rate unchanged at 3.75 per cent. It was mainly based on the uncertainty over the length of the conflict and the potential impact this could have on energy prices. The ECB’s decision to keep rates at 2 per cent also came as no surprise, with a hold having been long expected.
The Fed also left rates unchanged at 3.50 to 3.75 per cent on Wednesday, with Chair Jerome Powell stressing that officials would need to see more progress in moderating inflation in the US to ease further. “If we don’t see that progress, then we won’t see the rate cut,” he said. The US central bank also raised its inflation and GDP growth projections for 2026.
Here are some reactions from investment managers to the decisions.
Bank of England
Joaquin Thul, economist at EFG Asset Management, the
asset management arm of EFG International
“Going forward, it would be expected that the MPC will remain on
hold in the coming meetings in the absence of any solution to the
conflict in the Middle East, or at least a solution that would
allow the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, that would ease
pressure on energy prices. Until then, the developments on UK
domestic data will continue to trend lower but rates will be
expected to come down at an even slower pace than previously
anticipated.”
Daniele Antonucci, chief investment officer at Quintet
Private Bank (parent of Brown Shipley)
Despite weak domestic growth, the dominant concern is that
inflation expectations could de-anchor. Market pricing has moved
decisively, with investors now assuming the possibility of rate
hikes rather than further cuts. We think the bar for a hike
remains high, unless inflation expectations were to trend
significantly higher from here. The dataflow in the next few
weeks will be critical, as the energy situation remains fluid and
highly uncertain. Wage growth is easing, but not enough to offset
the renewed inflation pressure coming through from global
developments. The next policy meeting could take place against a
significantly changed backdrop if energy markets continue to be
disrupted.
“Given inflation concerns, and some degree of political uncertainty. we recently sold some gilts. We reallocated to emerging market bonds to gain exposure to selected oil exporters, keeping some extra cash to use if new opportunities arise. We bought gold at the onset of the Iran conflict, funded by selling US Treasuries, where inflation risks and fiscal spending ahead of the US midterms could become a concern for markets.”
Luke Bartholomew, deputy chief economist at
Aberdeen
“What is striking is that all policymakers voted to keep policy
on hold, which shows that even the more dovish members of the
committee want to see how this conflict plays out before cutting
again. With today’s labor market data showing that wage growth is
continuing to moderate, there is certainly a strong case for
bringing rates down eventually. But with the inflation outlook
now looking more challenging, the Bank will be focused on keeping
inflation expectations pinned down. So while the hurdle to a
return to rate hikes is very high, the economy could be facing a
long wait until the next cut.”
Chris Beauchamp, chief market analyst at IG
"If anyone was in doubt as to how the BoE would respond to the
current situation, then today is clear. A dramatic shift has
taken place, and hikes are back on the table as the bank
scrambles to respond to the likelihood of another inflation
surge. This was all unthinkable just weeks ago, but is a sign of
how the war with Iran has upended everyone's forecasts."
David Roberts, head of fixed income at Nedgroup
Investments
“I'm surprised at the tone of the MPC comments – an
incredibly "hawkish" hold. The market moved to price three rate
hikes, which seems too much. If the intention of the Bank was to
scare markets into raising the cost of finance for UK plc,
they could hardly have done a better job. It's yet another
reminder of the dangers posed to those focusing solely on the
domestic market as gilt yields surge both in outright terms and
relative to Germany, Japan and the US.”
European Central Bank (ECB)
Felix Feather, economist at Aberdeen
Investments
“We see the ECB hiking at least once by the end of this year. The
pace and timing of these hikes will hinge on the duration of the
conflict in the Middle East.”
Irene Lauro, senior economist – Europe and climate at
Schroders
"Higher energy costs inevitably push headline inflation higher,
but the policy dilemma hinges on second round effects
– whether wage and core inflation dynamics reaccelerate or
growth softens enough to keep medium-term inflation anchored.
Negative risks to growth have intensified as disruption to Qatari
liquified natural gas leaves the eurozone exposed at a seasonal
low in gas storage. A looming scramble for gas, with Europe and
Asia competing head-to-head, risks keeping energy prices elevated
for longer and further undermining growth. Markets are currently
assuming a temporary shock. If that proves correct, the ECB can
look through short-lived volatility in energy inflation. But that
is a big assumption, and the ECB is likely to remain firmly data
dependent to preserve flexibility in such an uncertain
environment.”
Nicolas Forest, CIO at Candriam
"The ECB is in an increasingly uncomfortable position. Escalating
tensions in the Middle East, coupled with disruptions to energy
supply, are once again clouding the inflation outlook in the euro
area. After several meetings marked by a clear disinflationary
trend, the recent rebound in oil prices and persistent
geopolitical risks now pose tangible upside risks to inflation
for the ECB. These pressures are likely to materialize not only
through direct energy costs, but also via second-round effects on
wages and services. At the same time, eurozone growth remains
subdued, leaving the economy vulnerable to further
shocks. In response, the ECB has revised its inflation
forecast to 2.6 per cent for this year – up from 1.9 per
cent – and now expects inflation to remain above 2 per cent
through 2028. At the same time, growth has been revised lower to
0.9 per cent this year (from 1.2 per cent). Absent a
sustained rise in oil prices above $100 per barrel and a
prolonged blockage in the Strait of Hormuz, the ECB is likely to
remain on hold through year-end. In this context, a bund yield
approaching 3 per cent may increase the relative attractiveness
of longer-duration assets."
US Federal Reserve
Mark Haefele, chief investment officer at UBS Global
Wealth Management
“Despite near-term risks that reduce the likelihood for imminent
easing, we believe that the medium-term policy trajectory still
points toward lower rates. We continue to recommend maintaining a
diversified portfolio that includes allocations to quality bonds
and gold against the current backdrop. The median dot in the
Fed's assessment of the rate path continues to imply two rate
cuts over the next two years, suggesting that policymakers are
willing to look beyond near-term oil price effects.”
Daniel Siluk, head of global short duration
and liquidity, and portfolio manager at Janus Henderson
Investors
“The Fed delivered a fully-expected hold, but the tone came
through more cautiously balanced than hawkish. The statement
explicitly notes that job gains remain low, inflation is
“somewhat elevated,” and uncertainty from Middle East
developments clouds the outlook, marking a clearer recognition of
two-sided risks. Overall: The Fed affirmed patience, acknowledged
geopolitical uncertainty, and resisted a more hawkish pivot even
with firmer inflation projections, likely a relief for markets
already tightened by recent volatility.”
Max Stainton, senior global macro strategist at Fidelity
International
“Looking ahead to the rates outlook for the rest of the year,
this will unsurprisingly be dominated by developments in the
Middle East. In our base case scenario of oil prices remaining
elevated but range bound at $90 to $110 a barrel, we would expect
the Federal Reserve to remain on hold for longer, with the bar
for near-term easing rising. If our base case scenario plays out,
then we would still expect one to two cuts from the Fed this
year. But we would note that events are shifting rapidly in the
Middle East with signs of escalation appearing after Iranian
energy infrastructure was hit today, which, if this persists,
almost certainly removes the chances of cuts this year.”