Family Office
Long view: The best of times, the worst of times
Ron Brounes tells a tale of two markets in his summary of the
2006 so far. Ron Brounes is a certified public accountant and
president of Brounes & Associates, a financial education,
communications and strategic planning firm based in Houston,
Texas.
"It was the best of times; it was the worst of times." Noted
economist Charles Dickens would have been proud of 2006's first
half. It has, after all, been a tale of two markets: one
confident and hard-charging; the other timid, lost-seeming and
weak. As a result, 2006 has so far proved interesting -
"interesting" in the sense of "confusing," "off-putting" and
decidedly "challenging" for many investors.
|image1|
It didn't start out that way, however. In the first quarter and
beyond, well into April, equities across several sectors and
capitalizations performed like gangbusters. Analysts began
predicting new highs for many indexes and a return to the
bull-market mentality that had been gone since the turn of the
decade, century, and millennium. International and small-cap
stocks led the way as investor confidence resurfaced.
The economy, as measured by gross domestic product (GDP),
appeared strong with no end in sight. In another apparent sign of
strength, rumors of merger and acquisition deals began to top the
daily business headlines, bringing back memories of those
high-flying days when big companies and private equity firms were
ripe with cash and looking to invest. Earnings results were quite
favorable in the early part of the year - even those "down on
their luck" techs began to create enthusiasm as analysts opined
that businesses and consumers would soon be upgrading older
systems. In April, the Nasdaq hit its highest level in five
years. As recently as 10 May 2006, the Dow Jones Industrial
average climbed to within 80 points of its all-time high.
Enter Ben Bernanke. "It's worrisome that people look at me
as dovish and not necessarily an aggressive inflation
fighter."
Nice beard
The economist chosen to replace "the man, the myth, the legend"
known by the world simply as Greenspan (like Madonna and
Prince, only one name is needed) found that an impressive
academic background and a nicely groomed beard alone don't bring
credibility. A few loose-lipped remarks in front of the wrong
audiences (mainly the business press) and Bernanke (and his
Federal Reserve cohorts) found his first few months in office to
be anything but a honeymoon.
Attempting to be viewed as a strong inflation hawk, Bernanke's
comments instead sent shock waves through the markets as
investors feared that future price pressures would keep the Fed
raising interest rates indefinitely.
Of course, as the perception goes...1) higher rates serve... 2)
to slow down the economy which... 3) could lead to reduced
corporate profits and... 4) ultimately much lower stock
prices.
Fear, panic, and the herd mentality set in as investors began to
sell (aggressively in some cases) equities. In May the Dow, the
S&P 500, and the Nasdaq lost ground, with many key
international markets following suit. Suddenly techs and
small-caps were no longer the places to be as investors sought
the safe-haven of more defensive plays.
As the second quarter came to a close, investors remained
uncertain about the next moves for the markets. Bonds reaped
short-term benefits from the stock market pullback with the yield
on the 10-year treasury briefly falling below 5%. Bargain hunters
appeared in later June and gravitated more to large-cap equity
issues. The flat yield curve implied that the next major move in
rates would be lower (bullish for bonds), though the Fed lifted
rates again on 29 June. Oil prices remained near all-time highs
as turmoil persisted across the globe. With threats of another
devastating hurricane season, investors simply couldn't get
passed their fear of inflation.
|image2|
By and large, the domestic economy seemed to be fairing far
better than those pundits at the Fed had implied. In the 1st
quarter of 2006 GDP soared by 5.3%, its strongest showing since
the 4th quarter of 2003. Though economists were convinced there
might be a slight come-down from these favorable levels, most of
them were upbeat about the longer-term prospects. After all,
unemployment sat at 4.6%, the lowest rate in five years.
Manufacturing releases revealed ongoing strength. Even certain
housing stats (primarily new home sales and starts) showed
surprising activity for a sector that many, including Greenspan,
had written off a while back. And consumers continued to be
primary catalysts for the economic growth as their confidence
levels reached four-year highs in April.
Chicken Little
But then a few (not so) carefully placed comments by the
powers-that-be at the Fed, changed the perception of the economy
virtually overnight. One day the Fed was nearing the end of its
current tightening cycle; the next day inflation was running wild
and the rate hikes would continue indefinitely. Besides Bernanke,
Fedsters Poole, Moskow, Guynn, Bies, and Kohn each felt the need
to throw in his "Chicken Little" two cents about inflation and
suddenly the "sky was falling" on the economy, markets, dollar,
commodities, everything.
Clearly, the messages implied that inflation had become public
enemy number one and the Fed would be steadfast in its mission to
control prices regardless of the consequences. Some economists
began speculating about the worst case scenario: a slow economy
with rising inflation.
In reality, the economy is not quite as strong as the
first-quarter GDP had implied and inflation isn't nearly as
worrisome as Fed officials keep saying; not yet anyway. Just take
a closer look at the numbers. Labor markets remain tight, but the
most recent non-farm job additions were lower than anticipated.
Some housing numbers have been surprisingly strong, but
existing home sales have been declining along with median
prices. Manufacturing releases indicate expansion, but the pace
of growth has slowed. Consumers have exhibited confidence, but
retail activity has weakened and the near-term outlook is sketchy
at best. Energy prices seem likely to remain high for the
foreseeable future, core inflation releases (excluding food and
energy) still seem manageable. And Fed officials are sounding
less alarming these days.
Moving forward, most economists expect the Fed to raise rates
again in August and to keep an eye on inflation (and geopolitical
developments) thereafter. If all goes well, that increase may be
the last one for a few months.
Then again, "Chicken Little" may be just a Bernanke speech away. -FWR
© Ron Brounes 2006. All rights reserved. Re-printed with permission.
.