Family Office
Impact of the Madoff case: a preliminary overview

Observers see the scandal as potential "serious blow" to client
confidence. The SEC last week filed charges in U.S. federal court
against renowned market maker, respected investment advisor and
former Nasdaq chairman Bernard Madoff and his RIA Bernard L.
Madoff Investment Securities (BLMIS) for bilking clients out of
at least $50 billion. Coming in the midst of recession and
financial crisis that has resulted in the collapse or takeover of
several big-name firms and sparked an unprecedented round of
U.S.-taxpayer-funded bailouts for Wall Street, it is feared that
the Madoff' scandal will further undermine investor
confidence.
Ponzi scheme
Madoff was arrested on Thursday and released on bail on Friday.
He is scheduled to appear in court on 19 December. If he is found
guilty of the crimes he is charged with, he could go to jail for
20 years.
BLMIS is in court-ordered receivership.
The SEC says that Madoff yesterday told "two senior employees" of
his firm that he was "finished," that he had "absolutely
nothing," that "it's all just one big lie," and that it was
"basically, a giant Ponzi scheme." Madoff's colleagues understood
these statements to be an admission by Madoff that he had for
years been paying returns to certain investors out of the
principal received from other investors. The BLMIS employees say
Madoff estimated losses from the fraud at no less than $50
billion, according to the SEC.
It now seems that the BLMIS employees Madoff came clean to were
his sons Andrew Madoff and Mark Madoff.
"We are alleging a massive fraud -- both in terms of scope and
duration," says the SEC's director of enforcement Linda Chatman
Thomsen. "We are moving quickly and decisively to stop the fraud
and protect remaining assets for investors, and we are working
closely with the criminal authorities to hold Mr. Madoff
accountable."
Epic proportions
Charles Ranson, CEO of Palm Beach, Fla.-based investment advisory
Integritas Advisors, views Madoff's alleged malfeasance, an
example of high-stakes shenanigans on the part of an independent
firm rather than a gigantic institution, as worrisome in its
potential impact on public confidence in the financial-service
industry as.
"This is not Merrill Lynch, this is not Goldman Sachs," Ranson
told the Palm Beach Daily News. "This is an individual
guy." But, because of Madoff's former high standing in the
financial-service community, his firm's long list of individual
and institutional investors, and the case's implications of lax
oversight by regulators, "this will be one of the largest legal
messes of the investment advisory business in history."
Indeed, class-action suits are already being filed.
BLMIS, a firm Madoff founded in 1960, had about $17 billion in
assets under management at the time of its latest ADV filing with
the SEC. The SEC says that "virtually all" of the RIA's assets
under management are now missing.
Thomsen's colleague Andrew Calamari, associate director of
enforcement in the SEC's New York regional office, described
Madoff's alleged fraud as one of "epic proportions."
Big red flag
Among investors said to be facing losses from the collapse of
BLMIS are New York Mets co-owner Fred Wilpon, GMAC chairman
Jacob Merkin, U.S. senator from New Jersey Frank Lautenberg, the
Boston-based Carl and Ruth Shapiro Family Foundation and Swiss
financial firms Union Bancaire Privee, Reichmuth, Benedict
Hentsch, the EIM Group and Notz Stucki. Zurich-based
UBS describes its exposure to BLMIS as "limited and
insignificant."
BLMIS reported a 10.5% annual rate of return over 17 years
through 2007.
Jim Vos, CEO of the new York-based hedge-fund consultancy Aksia,
views this supposed track record as a red flag in itself. "No
financial-trading strategy or investing strategy that we know of
-- or that anyone else knows of -- can produce decades of stable,
positive, low-volatility returns," he told CBS News.
Keith Whitaker, a research fellow at Boston College's Center on
Wealth and Philanthropy and director of family dynamics for
Wachovia's family office Calibre, says the psychic spillover of
BLMIS' demise could have a negative impact on clients' faith in
"trusted advisors" generally.
"If someone who was seen as a wise counselor only turns out to be
misleading and even betraying those people who trusted in him,
that's a real serious blow," Whitaker told the Palm Beach
Daily News.
The SEC complaint charges Madoff and his firm with violations of
the anti-fraud provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Advisers Act
of 1940. In addition to emergency and interim relief, the SEC
seeks a final judgment permanently enjoining the defendants from
future violations of the antifraud provisions of the federal
securities laws and ordering them to pay financial penalties and
disgorgement of ill-got gains. -FWR
Purchase reproduction rights to this article.