Art
INTERVIEW: Pictet, Private Equity House Take Art Investment Up A Gear With Athena
One of the world's biggest alternative investment firms - Carlyle - and Pictet, the private bank, have recently invested in a business focused on art finance. This publication spoke to some of the participants.
Eye-popping prices paid for art in all parts of the world - such as Asia, for example - have stirred investment interest from investors and the infrastructure of the market for such works has also developed. And a new shift involves the coming together of a US private equity titan and a venerable Swiss private bank. It is designed, so those involved say, to make the art investment business more liquid and flexible.
As commented upon in these pages several weeks ago (see here), New York-headquartered Athena Art Finance has launched with $280 million of equity capital led by The Carlyle Group and the private equity unit of Pictet, the Geneva-headquartered private bank. Athena’s chief executive is Andrea Danese, a structured finance veteran who, along with his colleagues, wants to use some of the tools of modern finance to shake up the art world.
Art is a relatively illiquid asset class – artworks have their unique qualities – and typically requires considerable research and diligence. This market has at times seen heavy inflows from investors seeking “real assets” in this age of central bank money printing, but the fortunes of art investment have been mixed – there have been a number of sharp setbacks.
So what is new about Athena?
This publication recently spoke to Pictet and Athena’s Danese about Athena and how he hopes it can build a new type of offering. He has the kind of background associated more with the dealing rooms of Wall Street, the City or Hong Kong than an auction house or hushed art gallery. He worked in the realm of investment banking for more than 20 years, toiling at JP Morgan and Deutsche Bank. During some of this time he worked in the credit derivatives market; in 2000 he started Creditex, a credit derivatives trading platform, and then he went to work for financial news and data firm Bloomberg on the financial market data side, before leaving in 2014. With his background in modern financial techniques and his interest in and passion for art came the inspiration for the Athena business model.
One key offering is art-backed lending and financing as a standalone business offering.
“It [Athena] is a non-bank lender, lending against art as collateral. We don’t have a banking licence since we do not take deposits. We don’t have to maintain regulatory capital requirements and we can afford to lend on a non-recourse basis. This means there is no recourse on any other asset on the balance sheet of the borrower,” Danese said.
Clients of such a business can range from a billionaire who wants to leverage his/her art collection to finance other investments and purchases, through to someone, such as a person with a multi-million collection who wants to buy new art and use existing art as collateral for a loan, and who does not want to risk all his/her wealth if a deal goes wrong, he said.
“We tend to lend money at mid to high single-digit rates,” he said, such as at Libor+700-900 basis points; this level is some way above conventional recourse-loan lending, given the different assets that can be claimed in the event of a default.
Danese said his firm isn’t particularly “revolutionary” (other organisations such as Citi Private Bank enable art owners to use items as collateral) but what is distinct is that it is the only clear-cut example of a standalone business financing art, he said.
“It will help the art market to grow and to give more access to this market and the marketplace will develop where art can be traded as a financial asset and seen as part of a person’s balance sheet,” he said.
Securities
“What we will achieve is to give access to art risk in the form
of securities. We can start to create things such as structured
notes. Athena will not just be a lender but a market maker in
terms of art risk. It is at present a relatively inefficient
and underdeveloped market,” he said.
Greater market sophistication should, other things being equal,
lead to improved liquidity, although as other market episodes
have shown down the years, liquidity can dry up in an abrupt
market downturn.
Data on returns shows that art can play a part in an investment portfolio, as well as give a bit of excitement to those whose heartbeat doesn’t race around the topics of stocks and bonds. Citigroup, in a recent Global Perspectives & Solutions report on art investing, has this to say: “Looking at over 100 years of data, art has underperformed equities but outperformed bonds. Over time there is a clear link between art prices and the global economy.
“For example, some of the strongest falls in art prices were observed during World War I, in the early 1930s, following the 1973 oil crisis, in the early 1990s and after the 2008 financial crisis. Overall, we conclude that art deserves a place within illiquid asset holdings for those who would otherwise hold art for many reasons. However, successful investment in art appears to be much more a question of identifying relative value than it is of gaining exposure to the market as a whole,” it said.
That report also pointed out that art’s superior investment performance to some mainstream asset classes clearly explains much of its allure.
“The global auction market for fine art has grown dramatically since the turn of the millennium, when sales were about $3 billion in total. Since then, global auction turnover has grown at an average annual compound rate of 13 per cent, reaching $16.1 billion in 2014. Not bad considering that the period was punctuated by the deepest global recession in almost a century. By way of context, in the same timeframe global GDP and exports grew at 3.5 and 8.1 per cent per year, respectively. The art market clearly outperformed, even during a time of solid average growth in economic activity and substantial advances in globalisation,” the bank said.
Among other data, the Citigroup study noted that in the last 88 years, annual real (excluding inflation) returns on art have been 3.7 per cent, while those for real estate have been 7.7 per cent, and for the S&P 500 Index of stocks, 6.8 per cent. For 10-year US Treasury notes, it is 1.9 per cent, and on gold, 1.6 per cent.
How it works
Athena has said that loans will be made against artworks with
highly marketable value, meeting the needs of high net worth
individuals, family offices, and other market participants whose
current options are limited to the recourse art-loans offered by
the major private banking institutions or the short-term loans
offered at double digit-rates by boutique lenders.
The firm says it expects to provide additional flexibility to financial advisors, estate planners, lawyers and other professionals who may now manage their clients’ collections as rationally as the rest of their asset portfolio.
Pictet’s involvement
Pierre-Alain Wavre, chairman of Pictet Wealth Management's
investment committee, told this publication that his firm’s
collaboration with Carlyle over backing such a venture as Athena
was part of a pattern of work with Carlyle that goes back more
than 20 years.
The move to invest in art was part of an ongoing examination by Pictet at new opportunities for investment, he said.
“Art has had a fantastic run and there is tremendous value to be had there; there hasn’t been an institution that only specialises in that space. There are some players, such as banks, who have done work in this area, but not a specialist firm,” Wavre continued.
“If you can finance a plane or a boat then you can finance art.”
There are a variety of institutions and people who need art finance, such as persons with collections who are not ready or able to sell but who want to add to a collection, or those with succession and wealth transfer issues, he said. Museums, dealers and others need financing for new acquisitions, etc. “There are a lot of different actors who need access to art finance,” he said.
Art can be a strong source of collateral, he said. It is important to adhere to strict limits and disciplines over issues such as loan-to-value ratios, and have a clear understanding of the underlying market, its liquidity, and other factors, he said.
“We are looking for a return on equity of around 10 to 15 per cent,” he added.