Client Affairs
Fed Cuts Interest Rates – Wealth Managers React

After the US Federal Reserve cut interest rates on Wednesday, as expected, wealth managers discuss the impact on the economy and asset allocation.
The US Federal Reserve cut interest rates by 25 basis points on Wednesday, bringing the federal funds rate to 3.75 to 4 per cent. This marks the second rate cut of 2025.
US equities fell as a result, while US Treasury yields rose. Chair Jerome Powell said lowering borrowing costs again in December is far from a foregone conclusion, a more hawkish tilt than the market was pricing. Investors had also anticipated the end of quantitative tightening to start imminently.
Despite a more cautious Fed, Mark Haefele, chief investment officer at UBS Global Wealth Management maintains his view that there will be two additional interest rate cuts between now and the early part of 2026, with improving liquidity supporting risk assets.
He believes that the labor market weakness should justify further rate cuts. “We maintain our call for a rate cut in December and one more cut in 2026, motivated by the cooler job market and the so-far limited impact tariffs are having on inflation,” Haefele said. “The Fed’s policy path forward has bolstered the case for quality fixed income as a source of income and portfolio resilience.”
"We recommend investors consider medium-duration high grade government and investment grade corporate bonds. We also expect gold to stay strong, and maintain our year-end target of $4,200/oz, while an easing Fed should continue to support the backdrop for equities,” he added.
  Other wealth manager reactions
  Isaac Stell, investment manager at Wealth Club
  “As widely expected, the Fed has opted for a brace of rate cuts,
  lowering rates by 0.25 per cent for the second month in a row. A
  significant slowing in the labor market over the summer meant
  today’s cut was a foregone conclusion. While the ongoing
  government shutdown means there’s no official data, private
  sources suggest that the slowdown has not abated. Stock and
  treasury markets have been rallying as the rate cut narrative and
  enthusiasm for AI tech stocks push markets to all-time highs.
  Today’s decision will do nothing to dampen that enthusiasm.
  However, stubbornly high inflation will make justifying further
  rate cuts harder. A hat-trick of cuts could be elusive.”
  Nicolas Sopel, head of macro research and chief
  strategist at Quintet Private Bank (parent of Brown
  Shipley)
  “While the end of quantitative tightening (QT) should somewhat
  ease concerns about rising government bond yields given a
  widening fiscal deficit in the US, we remain
  underweight in US Treasuries. Indeed, we think the
  Treasury market currently fully reflects expectations that the
  Fed will stop cutting interest rates at 3 per cent, suggesting
  that the downside in Treasury yields (and upside in Treasury
  prices) is limited.”
  Max Stainton, senior global macro strategist at Fidelity
  International
  "Looking ahead, despite Chair Powell’s insistence that a lack of
  data may manifest as caution around another rate cut, we expect
  this lack of data to manifest dovishly. The reduced data flow
  both masks the effects of previous DOGE layoffs and will start to
  produce its own negative growth effects as its length extends. As
  a result, we expect one additional cut by the end of the year in
  light of these dynamics and the revealed preference for being
  more dovish by halting QT earlier than most expected.”
  Daniel Siluk, head of global short duration
  and liquidity and portfolio manager at Janus Henderson
  Investors
  “The Federal Reserve delivered a largely uneventful October
  statement, lowering the federal funds rate by 25 bps to a target
  range of 3.75 per cent to 4.00 per cent. The decision was
  accompanied by a modest operational shift: quantitative
  tightening (QT) will conclude on December 1, with agency MBS
  repayments reinvested into Treasury bills going forward.
“The statement acknowledged limited data availability due to the recent government shutdown, but noted no material change in underlying trends. A new line indicating that “downside risks to employment rose in recent months” suggests that the Fed is responding to alternative labor market signals, though this does not appear to reflect a major shift in the broader policy stance. Liquidity operations were left unchanged, for now, and QT will continue through November. This may keep upward pressure on front-end rates in the near term, but the absence of new liquidity measures suggests that the Fed is comfortable with current conditions. Overall, the tone remains cautious but measured. We view this as a benign, non-market moving statement.”
  Jack McIntyre, portfolio manager, Brandywine
  Global
  “At a time when it’s flying with only one eye open, the Fed
  decided that the softening in the labor market is a bigger
  concern than the stickiness of inflation. This stance makes sense
  given that labor statistics are lagging economic indicators and
  monetary policy works with a lag. So for October, the Fed wanted
  to err on the side of a further rate cut. What makes less sense
  is the odd range of dissents. Miran’s call for a larger cut could
  be dismissed as too dovish. But Schmid's call for no cut combined
  with Powell’s comments during the press conference, in which he
  said he wants to put some daylight between the Fed’s view of
  potential future rate cuts with the market's view for December,
  can’t be easily dismissed. This divergence means less complacency
  in financial markets, more volatility, and more two-way flows.”
  Daniel Murray, deputy CIO and global head of
  research at EFG
  “Given the lockdown data drought, the fact that US inflation
  remains stubbornly above target whilst the labor market remains
  tight and the corporate sector appears to be booming, an
  intelligent alien who had some joint knowledge of economics and
  the Fed's mandate would have been forgiven for anticipating a Fed
  on hold or in tightening mode. However, in practise that was not
  to be, reflecting a rebalancing in the Fed's reaction function
  away from fighting inflation toward the full employment
  dimension of its mandate. Subconsciously, it is possible that the
  Fed has been influenced by pressure from US President Donald
  Trump administration's, particularly following the recent
  appointment of Stephen Miran to the Federal Open Market Committee
  (FOMC).
“By the time of the next FOMC meeting on December 9 and 10, it is hoped and expected that the government shutdown will be over. This will mean that more data should be available to allow the Fed to make a better-informed policy decision. The November FOMC decision can therefore be viewed as an insurance cut, partly mitigating against the tentative signs of labor market softening referred to in the statement and partly due to the potential for the economic uncertainty caused by the shutdown to have a more profound impact than is currently expected.”