Compliance
Compliance Corner: Hong Kong, HSBC

A regular round-up of compliance news, such as fines, permissions, new technology solutions to make tracking risks easier, and other developments.
Hong Kong, HSBC
The Securities
and Futures Commission has reprimanded and fined HSBC
Investment Funds (Hong Kong) and HSBC Global Asset Management
(Hong Kong) Limited HK$3.5 million. The actions were taken
because the entities broke regulatory requirements concerning
cash management for SFC-authorised funds.
The SFC found that some of the 53 funds managed and/or advised by HIFL and HGAML between 2010 and 2016 maintained cash deposits with connected entities, namely, The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited and/or its affiliates. The funds’ cash deposits were placed in interest-bearing accounts of the connected entities but mostly did not receive any interest.
An independent review revealed that prior to January 2015, HIFL and HGAML had no procedures in place to ensure that the funds’ cash deposited with their connected entities received interest at a rate not lower than the prevailing commercial rate. The review also found that whilst HIFL and HGAML had an established process to monitor the funds’ cash balances daily, such process was not documented in any policies and procedures and was performed for only 10 of the 53 funds, the regulator said.
The SFC said that HIFL’s and HGAML’s internal controls and procedures on cash management of the funds at the material time were “inadequate”. Also, they failed to manage and minimise the conflicting interests between their connected entities and the funds’ investors.
The regulator said it took account of how the entities agreed to make a voluntary payment of $433,257 to the affected funds, representing the financial impact arising from their failures; that they engaged an independent reviewer to conduct the review and took remedial actions to strengthen their internal systems and controls; and undertook to provide the SFC with a report prepared by an independent reviewer within nine months confirming that all identified concerns had been properly rectified. They also cooperated with the SFC in resolving its concerns and had no previous disciplinary record with the SFC.