Tax
50 States, 50 Tax Rates

The US is justly famed for its variety of local laws across the country and this applies particularly to taxes, in ways that may surprise the outsider.
When Alexis de Tocqueville traveled to the US in the 1830s to
write Democracy in America,
he viewed the states as small autonomous republics. The
states
“exercise the largest share of authority over the people because
they
are places nearest to its level,” the French aristocrat wrote in
his
classic book on the American national character. The federal
state has
grown massively since, especially in the twentieth century, but
states
are still different, not the least in tax terms.
The federal part makes up the greatest share of the income tax
take,
with a top rate of 35 per cent for people earning $379,150 and
over a
year, according to the Internal Revenue Service. On top of that,
the
state income tax can vary between zero and 11 per cent.
“From a tax point of view, the number one state is probably
Florida,
because there is no state income tax,” David Nave, tax director
at the
multi-family office
Pitcairn, told Family Wealth Report.
“Many of my clients establish second homes in Florida. Then you
have to
stay there for 181 days a year, you need to vote there and have
your
driver’s license there.
“South Dakota does not have an income tax either, but I don’t
see
people moving there because it’s in the middle of nowhere,” Nave
said.
The other states with no state income tax are Alaska, Nevada,
Texas,
Washington and Wyoming. However, it is important to remember that
the
absence of a state income tax is often paid for in another way;
Florida,
for example, has high property taxes.
“I think the State of Washington is the best one to live in,”
David Treitel, tax director at London-based
US Tax and Financial Services,
told this publication “Bill Gates lives there, so there are high
net
worth individuals in the state. And it’s good for business as
well.”
“Texas is the state with the lowest tax burden per capita,” Brent Mead, state government affairs manager at the National Taxpayers Union, told this publication. “Florida is doing a pretty good job as well, but all states have room for improvement.”
The NTU is a grassroots organization campaigning for lower taxes.
The mystery of where rich people live
The highest state income tax is found in Hawaii (11 per
cent),
followed by California at 9.3 per cent, paid by everyone earning
over
$46,767 a year compared with $200,000 in Hawaii, according to
the
Federation of Tax Administrators. New York has one of the highest
state
income taxes at 8.9 per cent, but it is only paid by those
earning
$500,001 and more a year; along with Connecticut and Maryland
this
is the highest upper limit in the US.
Some states have flat rates instead of income brackets.
Illinois,
home to the economic powerhouse of Chicago, has a flat rate of 5
per
cent. Some of the others with flat rates are Massachusetts (5.3
per
cent), Michigan (4.35 per cent) and Pennsylvania (3.07 per cent).
Perhaps surprisingly, the states with the highest top rate of
income
tax are the ones with the highest number of ultra high net
worth
individuals. California had most wealthy residents last year,
with about
9,800 people worth more than $30 million living in the golden
state,
according to Wealth-X. New York had about 7,300 UHNW
individuals.
Alaska, with no state income tax, is one of only three states
with fewer
than 100 UHNW individuals. It is worth noting that California is
by far
the most populous state in the US, while Alaska is one of the
least.
“California has been difficult for taxpayers’ for years; it has a very expansive government,” Mead commented.
Most experts agree that successful industry is the reason why people have been able to gain wealth in California and New York.
Does the tax tail wag the dog?
Wealthy people are generally thought to be one of the most
mobile
groups in society, but are they really prepared to move state to
pay
lower tax? Just 1.7 percent moved from one state to another each
year on
average between 2001 and 2010, the Center on Budget and
Policy
Priorities, a Washington DC-based think tank, said in a
study released earlier at the beginning of August. The report,
titled Tax Flight Is A Myth: Higher State Taxes Bring More
Revenue, Not More Migration, also concluded that cheaper
housing was a more important driver than taxes.
“A lot of people ask me where to go and live, but in the end
they
will live where they want to live,” Nave said. “Maybe schools
matter,
maybe you want to be near a beach, maybe you’re interested in
culture
and arts, and then you will probably want to live in New York
anyway.
But maybe you’re someone who wants to live in a place like
Wyoming, like
Dick Cheney (former vice president).”
Allison Shipley, Miami-based principal with PwC’s private
company
service practice, advises her client not to “let the tax tail wag
the
dog”; in other words: not to move to another state solely for
tax
purposes.
“One thing that is important to remember is the nuances,” Shipley
told Family Wealth Report.
“You have to take the cost of living into account, for example
price of
property and insurances. Then you have sales tax, which can vary
within
the states as well. Sales tax has not traditionally been a
decisive
factor for high net worth individuals in determining where
to live, but
it’s important to make them aware of it. The state sales tax is 6
per
cent in Florida.”
The highest state sales tax is found in California with 8.25
per
cent, according to the Federation of Tax Administrators, a think
tank
based in Washington DC. New York has 4 per cent but can go as
high as
8.52 per cent when the local rate is added.
Taxes from six feet under
Inheritance tax is another important consideration. There is no
such
tax in Florida, compared with one of the highest rates which
is found in
New Jersey at 16 per cent on bequests exceeding $1,700,000.
The
so-called “death tax” is in place in Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky,
Maryland,
Nebraska, Pennsylvania and Tennessee, according to the law
firm
McGuireWoods.
On top of that, there is a federal estate tax, gift tax, and
generation-skipping transfer tax of 35 per cent. However,
President
Obama’s tax relief act last year increased the gift tax exemption
from
$1 million in 2010 to $5 million, a change that allows a
tremendous
amount of wealth to be transferred. At the same time, most of
the
Republican presidential candidates have pledged to repeal the
federal
estate tax altogether.
Treitel has a theory concerning one high-profile
celebrity who some
years back moved to the US from the UK shortly before dying from
a
long-term illness in order to, he believes, avoid inheritance
tax. It is
worth noting that the person in question was born in the US.
No wealth drain, but slower growth?
Apart from extreme examples, it seems to be something of a
consensus
that businesses are more likely to move to lower their taxes
than
individuals, and that scrapping state income tax is only
politically
possible in smaller states. Oklahoma is one example of a state
which is
looking to gradually out-phase state income tax this year.
Judging from
the latest statistics from Wealth-X and the report by the Center
on
Budget and Policy Priorities, a wealth drain does not look like
a
looming crisis for New York and California.
“States should not be looking to lower income taxes to become
safe
havens for rich people; they should do it to create growth
and
development,” Mead said. “Income taxes are one of the largest
restraints
on economic growth, often more so than property taxes.”
Tocqueville was full of fear and hopes when he wrote his
masterpiece Democracy in America
in two parts in 1835 and 1840, respectively, and one can
speculate that
today’s complicated and diverse tax systems would have pleased
him. On
the other hand, the fact that the lion’s share of the tax cake
is
collected by the federal government would have been
unrecognizable to
the Frenchman who hated uniformity.